IV Therapy

One benefit of vitamin IV therapy is that your body can receive proper hydration from the fluids it contains. This dehydration is believed to largely explain why people feel better after receiving this treatment. Another benefit of Vitamin IV therapy is that it is an excellent way to supplement vitamins for people with digestive issues that otherwise prevent them from properly absorbing the nutrients in their food. Alan Gaby, who began treating some of Myers’ patients after the latter passed away in 1984, published his own findings after prescribing IV vitamin therapy to an estimated 800–1,000 patients. In addition, he documented 16 years of clinical results, including using the Myers’ cocktail in various treatments of many disorders. He reported it to be a safe and effective treatment, and the anecdotal reports of his patients supported these claims.

For example, one of his patients was a small boy, age 5, who had chronic asthma. The boy came to him wheezing and having difficulty breathing. He administered a slow IV vitamin therapy, and the boy’s wheezing resolved in a couple of minutes. He also treated multiple patients with chronic fatigue.

Gaby states in his clinical findings that he performed around 15,000 treatments. He reported that there were no severe adverse reactions, and the treatments were relatively well-tolerated by his patients.Unfortunately, not much more research has been published since his findings. However, IV vitamin therapy as a monotherapy or in cooperation with chemotherapy has been found to be beneficial for patients with cancer. While research has found no proof that it cures cancer, it may reduce fatigue and lift the spirits of those undergoing treatment.

There are very limited studies done on Vitamin IV’s.  Most were done on people who were in hospitals in with serious health conditions who could not drink or eat so it was used as an alternative nutritional source. Read this article for opinions from 3 medical practitioners.  One for, one neutral and one against.  However , it must be noted that the concerns voiced failed to take into account a proper patient intake before administering the IV