- The CDC has been reluctant to release any data on adverse events with the
COVID vaccines. They have repeatedly told us the vaccines are safe and
effective and have had no what they call Safety Signals. They have consistently
denied that the vaccines are causing any injuries and have made statement
about the safety for children without doing a single clinical trial on children.
The CDC did release some check- the-box v-safe data in published studies
prior to being forced to release all the v-safe check-the-box data by a group
called ICAN’s after a legal action.
The consistent game that the CDC played in these studies was to only
publish the data concerning health impacts for the first week after the
shot! (As a reminder, “health impacts” in v-safe means sought medical care,
missed school/work, or unable to perform normal daily activities.)
CDC released study after study claiming the vaccine was safe but only
included the health impact data for the first week after the shot. Only the first
week.
Remember, the CDC specifically chose to capture health impact information
at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 weeks after the shot, and then at 3, 6 and 12 months
after the shot. And the CDC knows, as discussed below, these vaccines can
cause harm well after the first week after injection. Nonetheless, despite a
diligent search, we could not identify a single study or report from the CDC
which released health impact data further out than the first week after
receiving the shot.
Just to make sure context is not lost, the 7.7% figure of unique v-safe users
who sought medical care was derived by analyzing all instances of medical
care that CDC designed v-safe to capture. CDC chose to track the need for
medical care at certain intervals. To avoid cherry-picking, 7.7% was derived
by simply looked at the percentage of unique individuals using v-safe
who reported seeking medical care.
But yet, here is an example of the data from v-safe that the CDC published in
its study (deceitfully) entitled Safety monitoring of mRNA vaccines
administered during the initial 6 months of the US COVID-19 vaccination
programme on March 7, 2022, which only included data from the first 7 days
after the shot:
As you will see in the “Reported medical care” row, CDC reported that
between .8% and 1% reported needing medical care in the first week after the
shot, depending on dose and brand.
Putting aside that this rate should not have been comforting, CDC is actively
seeking to have the public rely on this study to prove the Covid-19 vaccines
are safe, in order to increase vaccine uptake, knowing that it is at best
misleading.
You can see this same pattern repeated in study after study at the end of this
article.
CDC Knows Vaccine Harms Arise
Weeks After Vaccination
CDC is being deceitful because it knows harms from these vaccines can
happen after 7 days. Indeed, as those who litigate vaccine injury claims all
know, it typically takes at least a week, and often longer, for various vaccine
harms to manifest. For example, autoimmune issues. As another example,
consider myocarditis after Covid-19 vaccination – this often arises at least a
week after vaccination as seen in figure 1 of this study showing the incidence
of myocarditis during a 42 day period after receipt of the first dose of Pfizer’s
Covid-19 vaccine. Similarly, TTS, which can be caused by the Covid-19
vaccine, can arise up to 18 days after vaccination, as seen in slide 16 of this
CDC presentation. Both of these conditions typically require medical care.
Also, putting aside that CDC designed v-safe to capture medical care events
beyond 7 days, our federal health agencies, highly reluctant to state negative
things about a vaccine, also directly admit injuries can occur from vaccination
more than 7 days after receiving the vaccine. Here are some examples:
HHS’s Vaccine Injury Table (hrsa.gov) (encephalopathy w/n 5-15 days,
chronic arthritis w/n 7-42 days, thrombocytopenia w/n 7-30 days, GBS
w/n 3-42 days);
FDA’s Peter Marks, MD, PhD, discusses COVID-19 vaccine at American
Medical Association (ama-assn.org) (Dr. Marks, Director of FDA’s CBER,
said in reference to Covid vaccine, though query how he could say this
about a novel product, “We also asked for a minimum median of two
months follow up … because most adverse events with vaccines appear
within the first 42 days after vaccination.”);
Code of Federal Regulations (govinfo.gov) (For pandemic influenza
vaccine, GBS w/n 3-42 days, PTS w/n 2-42 days).
To further point out the arbitrary nature of picking one week as the time
frame to study, there are potentially concerning trends in seeking medical
care within the v-safe dataset that occur after the first week of vaccination.
For example, within seven days of dose 1 of a Pfizer vaccine, among those 3
years of age and older, .32% reported seeking medical care. But then look at
the percentage of users seeking care in each succeeding interval, noting these
figures are not cumulative:
I am not making any claims regarding what this chart means or could mean. I
am merely pointing out that stopping at one week on this chart is arbitrary.
Stopping at 42 days is also arbitrary. What doesn’t appear arbitrary is the
trend in the first 42 days, yet this trend, under a standard of only reviewing
medical care sought within the first seven days, will be missed or ignored by
the CDC.
Medical products cause harm. It happens. But what CDC did here is worse
than any harm from any medical product. It is even worse than simply not
telling the public the true rate of seeking medical care in the v-safe database.
Instead, CDC chose to actively mislead the public by repeatedly only
publishing studies that looked at data from the first week after each dose of
the vaccine. CDC knew this was, at best, highly misleading. This is what is
incredibly concerning.
It is one thing to make a mistake – to overlook something. But here, CDC
seemingly made a conscious choice to mislead the public on a critical issue. If
the check-the-box v-safe data was not clawed out of the CDC’s hands
through federal lawsuits, we would not know it engaged in this grand
deception on the American people.
The numerous studies at the core of CDC’s claim that Covid-19 vaccines are
safe are all deceptive by including only health impact data reported to v-safe
following the first week after each dose. Had CDC instead included all of the
data it actually chose to collect, it would have shown a seriously concerning
rate of Americans seeking medical care after Covid-19 vaccination.
That would not align with CDC’s claim the vaccine is safe.
V-Safe Studies
V-Safe Studies: Adverse Events Days 0-7 After Vaccine
Safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine among children and
young adults in v-safe Advisory Committee on Immunization
Practices (January 5, 2021)
COVID-19 vaccine safety update Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP) (January 27, 2021)
First Month of COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Monitoring – United States,
December 14, 2020-January 13, 2021 (February 26, 2021)
COVID-19 vaccine safety update: Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP) (March 1, 2021)
Safety Monitoring of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID19 Vaccine – United States, March-April 2021 (May 7, 2021)
Reactogenicity Following Receipt of mRNA-Based COVID-19
Vaccines (June 1, 2021)
COVID-19 Vaccine safety updates: Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP) (June 23, 2021)
COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Adolescents Aged 12-17 Years –
United States, December 14, 2020-July 16, 2021 (August 6,
2021)
Safety Monitoring of an Additional Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine –
United States, August 12-September 19, 2021 (October 1, 2021)
Early safety monitoring for additional COVID-19 vaccine doses:
Reports to VAERS and v-safe Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices October 21, 2021 (October 21, 2021)
COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Children Ages 5-11 years – United States,
November 3-December 19, 2021 (December 31, 2021)
Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among
Adults – United States, September 22, 2021-February 6, 2022
(February 18, 2022)
Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among
Persons Aged 12–17 Years — United States, December 9, 2021–
February 20, 2022 (March 4, 2022)
Safety of mRNA vaccines administered during the initial 6 months
of the US COVID-19 vaccination programme: an observational
study of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
and v-safe (March 7, 2022)
Safety update of 1st booster mRNA COVID-19 vaccination Advisory
Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) April 20, 2022 (April 20,
2022)
COVID-19 vaccine safety updates: Primary series in children ages
5–11 years Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
(ACIP) May 19, 2022 (May 19, 2022)
Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine First Booster
Doses Among Persons Aged =12 Years with Presumed
Immunocompromise Status — United States, January 12, 2022–
March 28, 2022 (July 15, 2022)
Reactogenicity of Simultaneous COVID-19 mRNA Booster and
Influenza Vaccination in the US (July 15, 2022)
Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Second Booster
Doses Among Adults Aged =50 Years — United States, March 29,
2022–July 10, 2022 (July 29, 2022)
Safety Monitoring of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Booster
Doses Among Children Aged 5–11 Years — United States, May 17–
July 31, 2022 (August 19, 2022)
COVID-19 vaccine safety update: Primary series in young children
and booster doses in older children and adults (September 1, 2022)
Association between history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and
severe systemic adverse events after mRNA COVID-19
vaccination among U.S. adults (November 1, 2022)
Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in United States Children Ages 5
to 11 Years (November 29, 2022)
Reactogenicity of Simultaneous COVID-19 mRNA Booster and
Influenza Vaccination in the US (July 15, 2022)
Safety Monitoring of Bivalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Booster
Doses Among Persons Aged =12 Years — United States, August
31–October 23, 2022 (November 4, 2022)
Safety Monitoring of Bivalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Booster
Doses Among Children Aged 5–11 Years — United States,
October 12–January 1, 2023 (January 13, 2023)
V-Safe Studies: Adverse Events Days 0-7 After
Vaccine & Free-Text to Day 14
Reactogenicity within 2 weeks after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines:
Findings from the CDC v-safe surveillance system (October 16,
2021)
V-Safe Studies: Free-Text Response Regarding
Menstrual Irregularities
Menstrual irregularities and vaginal bleeding after COVID-19
vaccination reported to v-safe active surveillance, USA in
December, 2020–January, 2022: an observational cohort study
(August 9, 2022)
V-Safe Studies: Pregnancy and Birth Related Vaccine Impacts
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in
Pregnant Persons (April 21, 2021)
Receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines preconception and during
pregnancy and risk of self-reported spontaneous abortions,
CDC v-safe COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry 2020–21
(August 9, 2021)
CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team. Receipt of
mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion
(September 8, 2021)
COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnancy : updates from the v-safe
COVID- 19 vaccine pregnancy registry (September 22, 2021)
File Type:
pdf
File Size:
295 KB
Categories:
Vaccines, Covid
